* From Fox, Applied Regression Analysis. ; * Table 9 in R. C. Angell (1951), "The moral integration of American Cities", ; * American Journal of Sociology, 57 (part 2): 1-140. ; data angell; input city $ 1-15 morint 17-20 ethhet 22-25 geomob 27-30 region $ 32-33 ; * city = "City"; * morint = "Moral Integration"; * ethhet = "Ethnic Heterogeneity"; * geomob = "Geographic Mobility"; * region = "Region"; cards; Rochester 19.0 20.6 15.0 E Syracuse 17.0 15.6 20.2 E Worcester 16.4 22.1 13.6 E Erie 16.2 14.0 14.8 E Milwaukee 15.8 17.4 17.6 MW Bridgeport 15.3 27.9 17.5 E Buffalo 15.2 22.3 14.7 E Dayton 14.3 23.7 23.8 MW Reading 14.2 10.6 19.4 E Des_Moines 14.1 12.7 31.9 MW Cleveland 14.0 39.7 18.6 MW Denver 13.9 13.0 34.5 W Peoria 13.8 10.7 35.1 MW Wichita 13.6 11.9 42.7 MW Trenton 13.0 32.5 15.8 E Grand_Rapids 12.8 15.7 24.2 MW Toledo 12.7 19.2 21.6 MW San_Diego 12.5 15.9 49.8 W Baltimore 12.0 45.8 12.1 E South_Bend 11.8 17.9 27.4 MW Akron 11.3 20.4 22.1 MW Detroit 11.1 38.3 19.5 MW Tacoma 10.9 17.8 31.2 W Flint 9.8 19.3 32.2 MW Spokane 9.6 12.3 38.9 W Seattle 9.0 23.9 34.2 W Indianapolis 8.8 29.2 23.1 MW Columbus 8.0 27.4 25.0 MW Portland_Oregon 7.2 16.4 35.8 W Richmond 10.4 65.3 24.9 S Houston 10.2 49.0 36.1 S Fort_Worth 10.2 30.5 36.8 S Oklahoma_City 9.7 20.7 47.2 S Chattanooga 9.3 57.7 27.2 S Nashville 8.6 57.4 25.4 S Birmingham 8.2 83.1 25.9 S Dallas 8.0 36.8 37.8 S Louisville 7.7 31.5 19.4 S Jacksonville 6.0 73.7 27.7 S Memphis 5.4 84.5 26.7 S Tulsa 5.3 23.8 44.9 S Miami 5.1 50.2 41.8 S Atlanta 4.2 70.6 32.6 S ; run; proc means data=angell; run; proc freq data=angell; tables city region; run;